Introduction

Executive and Agency Actions #

A common refrain is that the government is doing nothing about AI. This is not accurate - there is already a lot being done by the government. The need for more comprehensive AI regulation should be challenged.

White House actions under Biden-⁠Harris Administration #

White House actions under Trump #

  • EO 13960 directed agencies to conduct an annual inventory of their AI use cases, and to publish them to the extent possible. Here is the result.

Executive actions #

In May 2023, the Biden-Harris administration updated the National AI Research and Development Strategic Plan, emphasizing a principled and coordinated approach to international collaboration in AI research. The Office of Science and Technology Policy issued a request for information to obtain

public input on AI’s impact. The National

Telecommunications and Information

Administration sought feedback on what policies can create trust in AI systems through an AI Accountability Policy Request for Comment.

Regulatory comments

Acerbo datus maxime #

A common refrain is that the government is doing nothing about AI. This is not accurate - there is already a lot being done by the government. The need for more comprehensive AI regulation should be challenged.

White House actions #

Executive actions #

The Biden-⁠Harris Administration has already taken “ New Steps to Advance Responsible Artificial Intelligence Research, Development, and Deployment,” has tackled “ Racial and Ethnic Bias in Home Valuations,” put out Executive Order 4091, and released a “ Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights.

NIST AI Risk Management Framework

https://www.democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/schumer_ai_framework.pdf

The U.S. has released numerous frameworks and guidelines. Congress has passed legislation to preserve U.S. leadership in AI research and development, as well as control government use of AI. In May 2023, the Biden-Harris administration updated the National AI Research and Development Strategic Plan, emphasizing a principled and coordinated approach to international collaboration in AI research. The Office of Science and Technology Policy issued a request for information to obtain public input on AI’s impact. The National

Telecommunications and Information

Administration sought feedback on what policies can create trust in AI systems through an AI Accountability Policy Request for Comment.

Specific AI governance law and policy includes:

- Maintaining American Leadership in AI

- Promoting the Use of Trustworthy AI in the

Federal Government

- The Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI

Frameworks #

Acts and bills #


- Algorithmic Accountability Act [DRAFT]

National AI Commission Act [DRAFT]

- Digital Platform Commission Act[DRAFT]

- Global Technology Leadership Act [DRAFT]

- Transparent Automated Governance Act [DRAFT]

• Nonbinding frameworks:

- Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights

- National Institute of Standards and

Technology AI Risk Management Framework

- Guidance for Regulation of AI Applications

• Government initiatives:

- Voluntary Commitments from Leading AI

Companies to Manage the Risks Posed by AI

- TTC Joint Roadmap on Evaluation and

Measurement Tools for Trustworthy AI and Risk Management

- Congressional AI effort of Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y.

- National Security Commission on AI

- Bipartisan legislative framework for AI announced by U.S. Senators Richard

Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Josh Hawley, R-Mo.